All courses Math III · S-IC.6 52 of 55
Evaluate reports based on data.

Structure and classify a data-report claim

Problem
A headline states, “The supplement improves memory based on study results.” Classify the claim and state the design and sampling evidence needed to support it.
Your answer
Show answer choicesAnswer choices Work through the mathematics first, then compare your reasoning.Select the answer that matches your work.
Answer choices
With a free account

Stop now. Continue later.

A saved learning session lets you leave when you need to and return without losing your place.

Create a free account
With paid access

Open the complete course.

A subscription unlocks every problem type and variant in your selected course, not only the starter set.

Compare plans

Hint

Turn the headline into 'For [target], [response] is [direction] across/by [explanatory].'

A claim names a target, explanatory condition, response, direction/size, and inferential strength; evidence needed depends on design.

Solution walkthrough

01

Classify the verb

\[\text{improves}~->~\text{causal}~\text{claim}\]

The headline says the supplement changes memory, not merely that supplement use is associated with memory.

02

Identify the implied scope

\[\text{claim}~\text{concerns}~\text{people}~\text{represented}~\text{by}~\text{the}~\text{study}\]

Any supported conclusion can extend only as far as the study's participants and sampling evidence justify.

03

List the missing support

\[\text{causation}~\text{needs}~\text{valid}~\text{assignment}~\text{and}~\text{control};~\text{population}~\text{scope}~\text{needs}~\text{sampling}~\text{or}~\text{recruitment}~\text{evidence}\]

Design evidence addresses confounding and cause, while selection evidence addresses representativeness.

04

Evaluate the headline

\[\text{It}~\text{is}~a~\text{causal}~\text{improvement}~\text{claim}~\text{about}~\text{people}~\text{represented}~\text{by}~\text{the}~\text{study};~\text{support}~\text{requires}~\text{design}~\text{and}~\text{sampling}~\text{evidence},~\text{which}~\text{the}~\text{headline}~\text{does}~\text{not}~\text{supply}.\]

The headline alone omits the information needed to judge either causal validity or population scope.

+

Another way

  1. Underline the causal verb, then ask two questions: was treatment randomly assigned and who was sampled?

!

Common mistake

Do not treat the phrase 'based on study results' as evidence of a valid experiment or representative sample; those design facts must be stated or documented.