California course

Math III

Go further with polynomial and rational expressions, advanced functions, trigonometry, geometric modeling, and statistical inference.

Problem types
641
Practice variants
2,564
Problem types

Page 17 of 18

Each problem type has four distinct practice variants. Open a preview to move among all four.

S-IC.3 M3-049-A04-V01

State the bounded inferential role of random sampling

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Analyze sampling in layers: identify whom the frame covers, verify the chance-based entry mechanism, and limit generalization to that frame population. Random sampling reduces systematic selection bias but leaves sampling …

Preview problem
S-IC.3 M3-049-A05-V01

State random assignment's comparability and causal role

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Random assignment acts after recruitment by distributing treatment labels among enrolled units while preserving the planned group structure. It balances known and unknown confounders in expectation, which supports a causal …

Preview problem
S-IC.3 M3-049-A06-V01

Separate random sampling and assignment in an inference matrix

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Trace two separate stages of the design. Random sampling answers who enters and supports uncertain generalization to the frame-covered population; random assignment answers which imposed condition an enrolled unit receives …

Preview problem
S-IC.3 M3-049-A07-V01

Decide whether a causal conclusion is justified

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Causal support comes from imposing treatments, using a comparison condition, and assigning units by chance so groups are comparable in expectation. When other study conditions are adequately controlled, a systematic …

Preview problem
S-IC.3 M3-049-A08-V01

Decide whether a study can be generalized to a broader population

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Population generalization is governed by the source of the sample. A chance-based sample from a covering frame supports inference to the population represented by that frame, but not automatically to …

Preview problem
S-IC.3 M3-049-A11-V01

Identify exactly what randomization changes and why

Distinguish sample surveys, experiments, and observational studies; explain randomization in each.

Describe randomization by naming what stays fixed, what the randomizer changes, and what repeating that mechanism represents. When enrolled subjects remain fixed and only treatment labels move, repetition creates a …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A01-V01

Use a sample proportion to estimate a population proportion

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Turn the favorable count into a sample proportion by dividing it by the full sample size. That statistic, often written p hat, is the natural point estimate of the matching …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A02-V01

Identify a sample mean as the estimate of a population mean

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Match the kind of sample statistic to the corresponding population parameter. A sample mean provides the point estimate for a population mean, and the estimate retains the original measurement units. …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A03-V01

Write an interval estimate for a population proportion from a sample proportion and margin of error

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Center the interval on the sample proportion and move one margin of error in each direction. Treat a margin stated in percentage points as a direct additive distance, then check …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A04-V01

Use a sample mean and margin of error to write an interval estimate for a population mean

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

A mean interval is centered at the sample mean and extends one margin of error below and above it. Compute both endpoints with subtraction and addition rather than using only …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A05-V01

Estimate the margin of error from a simulation or bootstrap distribution

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Read the simulation's center and the stated usual range as different features. A margin of error is the typical center-to-edge distance, so subtract the center from either symmetric endpoint or …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A06-V01

Read bootstrap center, spread, and relative precision

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Separate location from spread: the bootstrap center estimates the parameter, while the standard error describes sample-to-sample variability. A one-standard-error interval moves one standard error in each direction from the center; …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A07-V01

Compare how the margin of error changes when sample size or variability changes

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Hold the population and confidence method fixed, then identify which factor changes. A larger random sample reduces the typical sample-to-sample variation of an estimate, so its standard error and margin …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A08-V01

Apply an explicitly informal interval-overlap rule

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Compute both uncertainty intervals before comparing their nearest endpoints. If one interval ends below where the other begins, subtract those endpoints to measure the gap; otherwise describe their overlap. Apply …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A09-V01

State confidence as repeated-method capture

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Confidence belongs to the sampling-and-interval procedure, not to a changing population parameter. Across repeated random samples, the parameter stays fixed while the computed interval varies; the confidence level is the …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A10-V01

Predict how a change in sample size, variability, or confidence level affects margin of error

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Hold the confidence level and interval method fixed before tracing the changed factor. Increasing random sample size reduces sample-to-sample variability and therefore the standard error; with the critical-value factor unchanged, …

Preview problem
S-IC.4 M3-050-A11-V01

Audit sample design and interval support for a claim

Use sample data to estimate population means/proportions and develop margins of error using simulation.

Audit the sampling design before using an interval for a population claim. Compute both endpoints, then compare the entire interval with the directional threshold; the conservative endpoint determines whether every …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A01-V01

Identify experimental conditions, unit, response, and contrast

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Read an experiment as who receives what and what is measured afterward. The treatment and control are assigned conditions, the experimental unit is the smallest entity independently assigned, and the …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A02-V01

Find the treatment-minus-control difference in an experiment

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Write the requested contrast symbolically before substituting the group means. Treatment minus control fixes both the subtraction order and the meaning of the sign: a positive result places the treatment …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A04-V01

Compare a signed treatment effect with its randomization distribution

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Preserve the signed treatment-minus-control statistic when locating the observation in the randomization distribution. The stated alternative determines which tail counts as at least as extreme, and the empirical p-value is …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A05-V01

Estimate an approximate p-value from randomization simulation results

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Use the declared extremeness rule to identify the relevant simulated results. Divide their count by the total number of randomizations, not by the observed statistic or sample size, and convert …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A06-V01

Classify randomization significance using explicit alpha

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Apply the significance rule exactly as stated by comparing the p-value with alpha on the same scale. Entering the rejection region makes the result statistically significant and leads to rejecting …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A07-V01

Interpret randomized effect size and significance in context

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Interpret the signed contrast before considering statistical evidence: its order determines direction, and its size with units describes the observed magnitude. Then compare p with alpha and use random assignment …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A08-V01

Classify statistical and practical importance on two axes

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Make two independent comparisons. Statistical significance comes from p versus alpha and describes evidence against the null, while practical importance comes from the absolute effect magnitude versus a declared context …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A09-V01

Audit random assignment for causal support

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Verify that a chance mechanism, rather than participant preference, assigns the treatment labels. Random assignment tends to balance observed and unobserved confounders across groups in expectation, supporting a causal comparison …

Preview problem
S-IC.5 M3-051-A11-V01

Compare treatment claims on separate evidence/design axes

Use randomized-experiment data and simulations to compare treatments and judge significance.

Compare the reports on separate axes rather than forcing one overall ranking. Smaller p-values indicate stronger evidence against a no-effect model, numerical effects describe observed magnitude, random assignment governs participant-level …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A01-V01

Structure and classify a data-report claim

Evaluate reports based on data.

Separate a report's claim from the evidence offered for it. Identify the target, explanatory condition, response, direction, and strength of the verb; language saying one condition improves an outcome is …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A02-V01

Parse a study report into population, sample, variables, and design

Evaluate reports based on data.

Parse a report from largest scope to smallest unit: the frame defines the supported population, the selected members form the sample, and one measured member is the observational unit. Then …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A03-V01

Audit sampling coverage, bias, and generalizability

Evaluate reports based on data.

Audit coverage and selection as separate stages. A random mechanism can operate validly within its reachable frame while people outside that frame still have zero chance to enter, creating undercoverage …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A04-V01

Decide whether a study design justifies a causal claim

Evaluate reports based on data.

Look for both an imposed treatment comparison and random assignment. Chance-based assignment tends to balance preexisting confounders, while a valid control condition shows what happens under otherwise comparable circumstances. When …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A05-V01

Classify and repair a misleading statistical presentation

Evaluate reports based on data.

Compare what the graphic's geometry implies with the relationship in the raw values. For bars, a truncated baseline changes visible lengths to distances above that baseline and can make a …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A06-V01

Audit whether a report supplies usable uncertainty

Evaluate reports based on data.

Turn each estimate and margin into a full interval before judging a lead, then compare the ranges rather than only the point estimates. Overlap prevents a clear separation under the …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A07-V01

Decide whether a report overgeneralizes beyond its data

Evaluate reports based on data.

Underline the group actually observed and the population named in the conclusion. A narrow, self-selected, or location-specific group does not automatically represent every member of a much broader population, even …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A08-V01

Evaluate correlation-causation claims in reports

Evaluate reports based on data.

Identify the evidence actually reported before accepting the conclusion's verb. An observational difference establishes association, but without random assignment the groups may differ on sleep, routines, health, motivation, or other …

Preview problem
S-IC.6 M3-052-A09-V01

Audit missing evidence with a structured checklist

Evaluate reports based on data.

A percentage is an estimate, not evidence that validates itself. To judge generalizability, inventory the target and frame, selection method, sample size, undercoverage, and nonresponse; to judge meaning and precision, …

Preview problem
S-ID.4 M3-053-A01-V01

Read normal mean and positive standard deviation separately

Use mean and standard deviation to fit normal distributions and estimate population percentages with technology.

Read location and spread as separate normal-model parameters. The mean locates the center, while the positive standard deviation measures a typical horizontal step in the original units. Variance is the …

Preview problem